This briefing document outlines the solution to a common network engineering challenge: connecting a private local area network (LAN) to the public internet using only static routing, as dynamic routing protocols are explicitly disallowed. The solution is a two-part process that addresses both routing and addressing limitations inherent in this scenario.

First, to handle the routing of traffic to any destination on the vast and unknown internet, a default static route must be configured on the local router. This special route, represented as 0.0.0.0/0, acts as a catch-all, directing any packet with a destination not explicitly known by the router towards the Internet Service Provider (ISP). This single configuration elegantly solves the problem of not being able to create individual static routes for every possible internet server.

Second, because the LAN uses a private IP address range (e.g., 192.168.10.0/24), these addresses are not routable on the public internet. To overcome this, Network Address Translation (NAT) must be implemented on the local router. NAT systematically translates the private source IP addresses of outbound packets into a valid public IP address before forwarding them to the ISP. The most efficient form of this is Port Address Translation (PAT), also known as NAT Overload, which allows all computers on the private network to share a single public IP address. The router maintains a translation table to ensure that return traffic is correctly translated back and delivered to the original host on the LAN. The interviewer's primary objective with this question is to assess a candidate's understanding of these two fundamental and interdependent concepts for enabling internet connectivity.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foundational problem is to establish a connection between a private Local Area Network (LAN) and the public internet under the constraint that dynamic routing protocols (like BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, RIP) cannot be used. This requires a manual, static configuration to manage traffic flow. The solution involves two distinct but complementary technologies: Static Routing and Network Address Translation (NAT).

The scenario involves several key components, each with a specific role and addressing scheme.

When host PCA (192.168.10.10) attempts to connect to the server at 99.99.99.9, it creates an IP packet and sends it to its default gateway, the local router (192.168.10.1). The router then consults its routing table to determine where to forward the packet.

Initially, the router's table only contains its directly connected networks:

1. LAN: 192.168.10.0/24 is connected to its internal interface.

2. WAN Link: 100.0.0.0/24 is connected to its external interface.

The router has no entry for the destination network 99.99.99.9. Lacking a matching route, the router has no choice but to discard the packet. As the source states, "router will be dropping this packet if you haven't configured anything."

While one could create a specific static route for the 99.99.99.9 network, this approach is not scalable. It is impractical to manually configure routes for every destination on the internet. The "wholesome purpose that interviewer wanted to ask this question" is to elicit a more robust solution.

This solution is the default route. A default route is a special static route that matches all possible destinations. It is configured using the network address 0.0.0.0 with a /0 subnet mask, which effectively means "match any IP address."

• Representation: 0.0.0.0/0

• Function: This route serves as the route of last resort. If a router cannot find a more specific match for a destination IP in its routing table, it will use the default route.

• Implementation: The default route is configured to point to the next-hop router that has broader internet connectivity—in this case, the ISP's router at 100.0.0.1.

With this single route, the local router is taught: "For any destination you don't know, forward the packet to the ISP."

Even with the default route correctly configured, the connection will fail. The packet, now forwarded by the local router, arrives at the ISP's router with its original source IP address of 192.168.10.10. This address belongs to a private IP range, which is non-routable on the public internet.

ISPs are universally configured to drop incoming packets that have a private source IP address. The primary reason is that return traffic cannot be routed back. The ISP has no way of knowing where the private 192.168.10.0/24 network exists in the world. Consequently, the source notes that when the packet reaches the ISP, "Airtel is going to drop it because it says that the source address is actually the private address."

The solution to the private addressing problem is Network Address Translation (NAT). The local router must be configured to perform NAT, which involves changing the source IP address of outbound packets from private to public.

The process unfolds as follows:

1. Translation: As the packet from 192.168.10.10 leaves the local router towards the internet, the router changes the source IP address to one of its valid public IPs (e.g., 100.0.0.3).

2. Table Creation: The router records this translation in a NAT table in its memory, creating a mapping: Internal IP 192.168.10.10 <-> Public IP 100.0.0.3.

3. Forwarding: The modified packet (Source: 100.0.0.3, Destination: 99.99.99.9) is sent to the ISP, which now accepts and forwards it.

4. Return Traffic: The server at bridgey.com sends its response back to the public address 100.0.0.3. The packet travels across the internet and arrives back at the local router.

5. Reverse Translation: The local router consults its NAT table, finds the entry for 100.0.0.3, and sees that it corresponds to the internal host 192.168.10.10. It then changes the destination address of the packet back to 192.168.10.10 and forwards it onto the LAN.

The one-to-one mapping described above is known as Static NAT. This method is inefficient as it requires a unique public IP for every internal host that needs to communicate simultaneously.

A far more common and scalable solution is Port Address Translation (PAT), also referred to as NAT Overload. PAT allows an entire network of private hosts to share a single public IP address. It achieves this by adding the source TCP/UDP port number to its translation table, creating unique mappings for each session (e.g., 192.168.10.10:1234 <-> 100.0.0.2:50001). This is the mechanism that allows "all the computers whether it's two computers or 10 computer 20 computers they all will be talking with one address."

The configuration, described as "clerical work," involves a few key commands on the router.

The core intent of this interview question is to verify a candidate's practical and conceptual knowledge of two cornerstone networking principles:

1. The use of a default route as the only scalable static routing solution for general internet access.

2. The fundamental necessity of Network Address Translation (NAT) to bridge the gap between private, non-routable LAN addresses and the public internet.